The Great Divide: Sanders’ Revolution vs. The Apathy of Pragmatism

Bernie Sanders and his revolution have failed. What’s worse, is that it was all a con that Sanders perpetrated on the young and impressionable. Disgusted and dismayed they will now abandon the progressive movement and fracture the democratic party.

Bleak isn’t it? This is the current political landscape as seen by Kevin Drum of Mother Jones. In his article released this Friday, Drum takes aim at Sanders and his supporters, and in one fell swoop manages to portray Sanders as a fraud, his supporters as naïve and facile, and the political world as a quagmire where, “You have to buy off interest groups, compromise your ideals, and settle for half loaves.”

As I read his article though, instead of feeling rage and indignation at the cheap and distorted characterizations used in his attack, I actually felt something else. I felt pity. I thought, here is a man who must wake up on a bright and beautiful day, look up at the sun and think: One day that ball of fire will blowup and take our entire planet with it. What a grim and colorless world in which he lives!

Drum’s main argument is that Bernie Sanders knowingly misled his supporters, selling them on an impossible revolution. There can be no revolution, Drum argues, because economic revolutions do not occur absent a dire financial crisis, and what we are experiencing today pales in comparison to the economic desolation of the Great Depression. And, to be fair, he’s right.

What he fails to grasp, however, is that the movement Bernie Sanders has catalyzed isn’t an economic revolution, it is a political one. Of course, it has strong economic consequences, but these are secondary to the primary tenet, which is simply this: Our democracy is not for sale. Our economy does not need to be overthrown, but we the people do need to take ownership of our democracy and stop the wealthy few from turning it into a plutocracy. If this is idealistic, then I am proud to be guilty, because it is not the naïve optimism of a fool. Rather, it is the dream of the disenchanted who have awoken to remember that what is, is not right.

Drum doesn’t see this. He sees the movement as a fad, a toy which children discard once the sheen of novelty wears thin. There are, however, two great insights hidden in the dark corners of Drum’s worldview.

The first, is that he is not alone in this belief. In fact, he clearly articulates the perspective of a great many people in this country. These are the voices you hear so often who, with varying degrees of enthusiasm, claim that Hillary Clinton is the superior candidate because she is pragmatic. She sets her sights on the attainable, strikes deals, and compromises as is necessary to achieve a modest outcome. That’s just politics, they say. Meanwhile, Bernie Sanders wont be able to accomplish anything at all. His lofty goals and refusal to compromise will inevitably lead to failure.

Ignoring the questionable validity of these arguments (Bernie fought for decades in the trenches and knows exactly how the system works, see here for an incredible read), Drum blindly presents us with a false dichotomy. Our choice is not between pragmatism and delusion. It is between the apathy of accepting the status quo and the bittersweet joy of knowing that though you may have fallen short at least you fought for what you believe in. Change does not come easily, nor does it comes quickly, but it certainly does not come at all if you surrender before you have even begun. Imagine what would have become of the Civil Rights Movement if leaders like Martin Luther King Jr. instead of saying, “I have a dream,” said, “dreams are for children.”

This is The Great Divide. It is the divide between those who have decided that what is, is not right and does not have to be, and those who have chosen the apathy of pragmatism, believing that what is, is the best we can do.

The second insight, can be found in Drum’s claim that, “Most likely Bernie will have no lasting effect, and his followers will scatter…” This point is critically important because it holds up a mirror to the revolution, revealing a great truth: We do not know its future. We hope this is the beginning, but cannot say for certain, and right now, when we try, those words ring hollow in the ears of those who still stand across the divide. The story of our revolution is as yet unwritten. And that, my friends, is truly a beautiful thing. It means we each have the power to shape that story.

If time proves Drum right, it will be because we crossed The Great Divide to join the masses like Drum, inert and dull with the apathy of pragmatism. However, if he is wrong, it will be because millions of people took ownership of a movement. Bernie struck the match, but we are the flame, and every day we must make a choice: Does the fire of our revolution still Bern? If we answer in the affirmative, then time will prove that no matter the result of this election, that the revolution will have indeed won.


Joseph Bisoglio

Joseph graduated with a BA in English from UCLA. He worked in entertainment for 10 years before deciding to pursue a career in science. Joseph studied Psychology at Columbia University and worked in cognitive neuroscience research at the Columbia University Medical Center. He is currently completing his pre-med coursework at UC Berkeley in preparation for a career in medicine. Joseph is a passionate progressive whose strongest political beliefs center on climate change, voter rights and campaign finance reform.

Leave a Reply