Racial Prejudice In The GOP Blocks Supreme Court Nomination

President Obama recieves the Nobel Peace Prize Photo: MFA Norway/ Per Thrana Utenriksdepartementet UD
President Obama receives the Nobel Peace Prize
Photo: MFA Norway/ Per Thrana Utenriksdepartementet UD via Flickr.com

The Republican Party refuses to negotiate or cooperate with President Obama on anything. They have made this quite clear through their behavior and actions over the last seven years.

In recent days, various members of the Republican Party, including Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, have declared President Obama should give up his responsibility of selecting a new Supreme Court Judge. They state they will not give their approval regardless of who he nominates. They claim to have grievances with him for dealing with issues they refused to deal with. Their claims are based primarily on bruised egos and a long-standing prejudice against blacks. Many Republicans in Congress seem to believe a black man should not be President of the United States.
This is certainly not the first time the Republican Party has expressed their prejudice against having a black President.
After Hurricane Sandy, Chris Christie, the governor of New Jersey, greeted President Obama with a bear hug and praised him as “incredibly supportive.” It should come as no surprise that Gov. Christie, who had spent the last few days delivering bear hugs and words of sympathy to shell-shocked residents, was extremely relieved to see the President, and the financial support that came with him. However, members of the Republican party immediately criticized Christie for the hug, claiming they felt betrayed, and that he hurt Romney a week before the presidential election. (In their minds Christie should have shunned the President, and refused any help. That would have really helped the people of New Jersey.)

Republicans have said the American public should ignore their party’s historical support of racial prejudice. That the party has changed and should not be held responsible for the actions of a few from a generation ago. If one views the behavior and actions of the Republican Party, it is difficult not to conclude they continue to support racial prejudice, regardless of what they say.

In 2015, after six years of refusing to meet with the President, Republican congress members blamed him for refusing to cooperate and negotiate with them. They blamed President Obama for blocking immigration reform, claiming his initiatives made it difficult for them to pass legislature on the issue. He was blamed for their inability to work on tax reform, and has been criticized for providing an improved sick leave package for Federal employees. (Republican hypocrisy is truly astonishing!)

Some political observers believed the election of the first African-American president was a final step in creating multi-cultural equality in America. This was a premature assumption (one the author was also guilty of) regarding racial tolerance.

Horribly enough, it seems to have galvanized right-wing whites to do whatever they can to make his presidency a failure. While Republican leaders claim they are in an ideological fight over the principles of “small government,” their actions, and some “former” Republicans, say otherwise.

Col. Lawrence Wilkerson once stated publicly stated the Republican Party is “full of racists” who wanted President Obama out of office because of the color of his skin. “Let me just be candid, my party is full of racists. And the real reason a considerable portion of my party wants President Obama out of the White House has nothing to do with the content of his character, nothing to do with his competence as commander-in-chief and president, and everything to do with the color of his skin. And that’s despicable.”

The Republican Party has a long history of voter suppression tactics. They strongly supported efforts to keep blacks from voting in the South and are currently attacking the non-existent problem of voter fraud. Republicans have instituted various forms of voter suppression aimed at preventing Democratic-leaning blocs from voting. The new ID requirements can be difficult for the elderly, students, people with disabilities, low-income individuals, and people of color.

Sadly, this proves that racial prejudice still exists in the United States, and that many of our elected officials represent and support this kind of behavior. They actively block the right of people of color to vote. The Republican culture has such an established philosophy of racial prejudice, they must be considered guilty until they can prove with their “behavior and actions,” that they have changed. Currently, no such proof exists. Quite the opposite. Their behavior in the present speaks volumes.

Ignoring the more obvious forms of prejudice, there have been more subtle expressions which would never have taken place with a white President. During one of the President’s first speeches before Congress, Republican Joe Wilson yelled, “You lie!” at the top of his voice while Obama spoke on health care reform. House Speaker Boehner rejected President Obama’s request to speak to a joint session of Congress, the first denial in the history of the U.S. In a rant, Sarah Palin wrote on Facebook, “President Obama’s shuck and jive shtick with these Benghazi lies must end.” More recently, Boehner snubbed our President by inviting the Israeli Prime Minister to speak before congress, without notifying the President. A white President would not be treated with such contempt and disrespect.

There are Republicans who are not racist, and who are disgusted by the behavior and actions of their party. Many are dismayed at their party’s efforts to prevent people from voting through archaic voter suppression tactics. But it impossible to reject the truth. On a broad scale, the Republican Party GOP supports racism. The Party rarely reprimands its members for racially charged language, and attempts (with some success) to stop minorities from voting. Can they really claim these are not expressions of racism? And isn’t passive support of prejudice just as bad as the act of prejudice?


Keith D. Foote

Keith is also a freelance writer. He has written an alternative physics book titled the Ultra-Space Field Theory, and 2 sci-fi novels. Keith has been following politics, and political promises, for the last forty years. He gave up his car, preferring to bicycle and use public transport. Keith enjoys yoga, mini adventures, spirituality, and chocolate ice cream.

Leave a Reply